ESL Practice Using Would Like to Order in a Restaurant

One of the most important tasks in English is ordering food at  a restaurant. In general, use the form Id like ... when ordering food in a restaurant. A common question for someone taking an order is What would you like for ....   Example   Peter: Hello, Id like a table for lunch please.Host: Certainly, right this way.Peter: Thank you. Im really hungry! (sits down)Host: Enjoy your meal!Waitperson: Hello, My name is Kim. How can I help you?Peter: Yes, I would like to have some lunch.Waitperson: Great. Would you like a starter?Peter: Yes, Id like a salad.Waitperson: What else would you like?Peter: Id like some spaghetti. Is it good?Waitperson: Yes, its very good. Would you like something to drink?Peter: Yes, Id like a glass of root beer, please.Waitperson: Certainly. Is there anything else I can do for you?Peter: Yes, I cant read this menu. How much is the spaghetti?Waitperson: Its $5.50, and the salad is $3.25.Peter: Thank you. Notice how the waitperson asks: What would you like? and Kim responds: Id like ... Would like is the polite form used when asking and requesting. Would like can be used in the question form to make an offer: Would you like a cup of tea?Would you like something to eat? Would like can also be used to make a request.   Id like a hamburger, please.I would like something to drink, please. Notice that would like is shortened to Id like. This is an example of a contraction.   Practice Exercise Fill in the gaps in this dialogue using key words and phrases youve learned with would like to order in a restaurant. Waiter: Hello, Can I help you?Kim: Yes, _____ to have some lunch.Waiter: _____ a starter?Kim: Yes, Id like a bowl of chicken soup, .Waiter: And what _____ for a main course?Kim: Id like a grilled cheese sandwich.Waiter: _____ like a drink?Kim: Yes, _____ a glass of Coke, please.Waiter (After Kim has her lunch): Can I bring you anything else?Kim: No thank you. Just the check.Waiter: Certainly.Kim: I dont have my glasses. _____ is the lunch?Waiter: Thats $6.75.Kim: Thank you very much.Waiter: Youre _____. Have a good day.Kim: Thank you, the same to you.   Answers Waiter: Hello, Can I help you?Kim: Yes, Id like to have some lunch.Waiter: Would you like a starter?Kim: Yes, Id like a bowl of chicken soup, please.Waiter: And what would you like for a main course?Kim: Id like a grilled cheese sandwich.Waiter: Would you like anything to drink?Kim: Yes, Id like a glass of Coke, please.Waiter (after Kim has her lunch): Can I bring you anything else?Kim: No thank you. Just the bill.Waiter: Certainly.Kim: I dont have my glasses. How much is the lunch?Waiter: Thats $6.75.Kim: Here you are. Thank you very much.Waiter: Youre welcome. Have a good day.Kim: Thank you, the same to you.

Coping with Stress Essay - 2034 Words

Stress is part of our lives. We live with it, deal with it, and above all worry about it. Our way of life, the area in which we live, the economy, and our jobs can cause a great deal of stress. Not everyone deals with the same level of stress and there are several factors that can impact our lives and cause us to have higher or lower stress levels. We can have stress caused by Cataclysmic events which according to Feldman (2009) are events that can affect many people at the same time and are â€Å"disasters such as tornado and plane crashes, as well as terrorist attacks†. (p418). Other factors are personal stressors and can be caused by events such as a divorce, death or a loved one or the loss of a job. (Feldman, 2009). The†¦show more content†¦These are stressors we live with and deal with on a daily basis. Work Stress and Mental Health Some people have higher levels of stress because they might have a very stressful job. Police officers, fire fighters, soldiers in a war zone, health care providers, long distance truck drivers, and yes, even educators (think of a classroom full of students where you are responsible for making sure that they are learning the skills they need to succeed) have very stressful jobs. According to Elkin and Rosch (1990) workplace related stress in a major problem in the U.S. and it creates a major expense for corporations. Koeske, Kirk, and Koeske (1993) indicate that all jobs have some level of stress but jobs that are in the human services have additional stressors because they â€Å"derive from intense involvement in the lives of others†. (p.319). They also refer to the type of stress experienced by individuals working in human services as â€Å"burnout† (Koeske, Kirk, and Koeske, 1993, p.319). Another factor that can influence our st ress level is how we handle life’s demands. There are different ways of reacting to the situations we face every day of our lives. We have all heard of expressions such as ‘road rage’ and ‘going postal’. These are terms that we have come to identified with violent reactions to stressors caused by situations all of us face every day. How many of us have experiences in the road thatShow MoreRelatedCoping With Stress And Stress1434 Words   |  6 PagesIn a research, it is shown that 80% of the adults from the age of 30 – 50 admit that they have had a lot of stress in the past year. (Ted Talks, 2013) Adults who are working say work stress is the most major stress that they have. (Delvin, 2011) In Canada, the percentage of the population experiencing high level of stress has not decreased but increased since 2003. From the year 2012 to 2013, the percentage has already risen from 22.7% to 23.0%. Despite of the small change in numbers, it is a observedRead MoreCoping Stress958 Words   |  4 PagesStudents Coping with College Life and Stress In the present day, there are many common factors amongst college students, that may lead a student to feel overwhelmed. Some students may face depression, anxiety, stress, eating disorders, along with other challenges. However, there are ways for college students to cope with what they are dealing with. Coping with these stresses will be an advantage for students. It is important to know what the causes are for students who are overwhelmed, who it affectsRead MoreCoping With Stress And Burnout Essay1659 Words   |  7 Pages  ¬ Coping with Stress and Burnout in the Pediatric Oncology Nursing Field Erica R. Keim Bloomsburg University ¬Ã‚ ¬Ã‚ ¬ Abstract Background. Pediatric Oncology Nursing is nursing that involves the care of children under the age of eighteen that have been diagnosed with cancer. This field of work is commonly associated with burnout and high levels of stress among the working staff. Although prevalent in every workplace, causes and coping methods of both burnout and stress have been neglectedRead MoreCoping With Stress Essay1454 Words   |  6 Pagespeople have stress and they find ways to cope. Stress is a person’s feeling that is created by our body when there is certain event that can cause tension to strain upon our physical, mental, and emotional state. Stress can be caused by being in college, the tests, homework, clinicals and state boards can have an overwhelming amount of pressure. Stress can be physical and mental strain on our body, this can be very harmful. The tragic loss of a loved one can cause tremendous amount of stress. LearningRead MoreCoping With Stress Essay2106 Words   |  9 Page sCollege is all about accomplishing schoolwork at the wee hours, and waking up early in the morning to run errands; surviving college requires diligence, and is definitely stressful. Many researchers have their own definition of stress, but the primary definition of stress is it is a subjective feeling produced by events perceived as being threatening and uncontrollable. Similarly, there are a number of events that can be stressful to people from minor to chronic events, and these events that causeRead MoreReflection On Coping With Stress769 Words   |  4 Pageshave learned that I am not doing so well in coping with stress from life since I have been taking this class. Many different things that I have not paid attention to as warning signs not just to my emotions, but also to my health. First, we have to define what the word adjustment is in physiology to be able to understand how to deal with everyday stressors and situations that arise in our lives. â€Å"Adjustment is the phy siological process of adapting, coping with and managing.† (Santrock, 2006. P.5).Read MoreCoping with Stress in an Organization2242 Words   |  9 PagesCoping With Stress In An Organization 26 November 1994 Table of Contents I. Introduction II. Defining Stress III. Types of Stress IV. How to Handle Stress V. Recognizing Stress VI. The Military and Stress VII. Summary I. INTRODUCTION Since the beginning of mankind there has always been some kind of stress affecting how people feel, act and cope with situations. In this paper we will look at the definition of stress and what causes peopleRead MoreEssay On Stress And Coping1885 Words   |  8 Pagesslower. When a person experiences high levels of stress it can turn into chronic stress, which can cause our cells to age and die faster. We all experience stress daily and need skills in order to manage stress and move on. Individuals who are more resilient to stress tend to do better and be healthier then the individuals who are unable to deal with stress properly and those who have poor management skills in dealing with stress. Diet, exercise, stress, wear and tear all contribute on how are our cellsRead MoreThe Transactional Model Of Stress And Coping786 Words   |  4 Pagespsychological well-being and requiring action to restore balance (Lazarus Cohen, 1977). Beginning in the 1960s and 1970s, stress was considered to be a transactional phenomenon dependant on the meaning of the stimulus to the perceiver (Lazarus, 1966; Antonovsky, 1979). Core Assumptions and Statements The Transactional Model of Stress and Coping is a framework for evaluating the processes of coping with stressful events. Stressful experiences are construed as person-environment transactions. These transactionsRead MoreEssay on Coping with Stress at Work1593 Words   |  7 PagesStress at Work There are many jobs in the world and many professionals carrying them out. Every worker has a task to complete and it isn’t always easy. Jobs can demand a lot and specific deadlines of when things need to be done. Some jobs require workers to have more than just one responsibility. Meeting deadlines and being responsible of other tasks can be a bit stressing at times. Stress is not only at home but it is also suffered in jobs, some more than others. Many workers experience job stress

Organization of Educational Institutions free essay sample

While a private liberal arts college may have a large board of trustees, and a public research university nested in a state system no trustees of its own, the vast majority of public and private universities are overseen by an institutional or system-wide governing board. This somewhat paradoxical combination Of distinctiveness and uniformity reflects the unique characteristics of individual colleges and universities, and the shared-task environment (including strategic planning, fiscal oversight, curriculum planning, and student affairs) common to American postsecondary institutions.Scholars of higher education view many aspects of private colleges and universities as significantly different than public universities. Yet the reliance on bureaucratic organizational structures and the belief in search, advanced instruction, and service at both types of institutions shape many aspects of public and private university governance structures in a fairly uniform manner.The organizational s tructure of colleges and universities is an important guide to institutional activity, but not the only one. Scholars of higher education have developed a variety of multi-dimensional models of organizational behavior that also shed considerable light on college and university structure and process. Multi-dimensional models seek to explain organizational behavior across institutional types, and in various institutional activities.The models vary somewhat in the number of dimensions incorporated, from J. Victor Baldrics three dimensions (bureaucratic, collegial, and political) and Lee Bellman and Deterrence Deals four-cornered frame (structural, human resource, political, and symbolic) to Robert Birdbrains five dimensions (bureaucratic, collegial, political, anarchical, and cybernetic). These models are quite helpful in thinking about organizational structure and process within colleges and universities.The same institution may evidence a bureaucratic, hierarchical decision-making process in its central administration, and a collegial process in its academic senate. It is a combination of organizational structure and process that shapes college and university behavior. Public and private colleges and universities of all types incorporate key authority structures, including a gov erning board, a president or chancellor, a cohort of administrative leaders, and an academic senate. In public institutions these core organizational entities collaborate with such external authorities as state and federal political leaders, community organizations, and members of the public, as well as business interests and philanthropic foundations. These external organizations routinely interact tit and shape the policies and procedures of the universitys internal organizational structures. The degree of uniformity in private and public college and university organizational structures has been shaped by the nature of demands on the postsecondary system since the mid-twentieth century.Although the key governance structures of colleges and universities were present prior to the turn of the twentieth century, the full scope of the universitys multifaceted organizational structure, most scholars agree, was not realized until after the rise of the research university, in the wake of World War II. In 1 963 then-president of the University of California system, Clark Kerr, described th e postwar American university as a multiversity. The term captured the increasingly complex organizational and governance structures required to negotiate its ever-expanding task environment.Governing Boards A universitys governing board, also known as the trustees, regents, or board of visitors, possesses fundamental legal authority over the university. The authority of the governing board is vested in it by the state wherein the school resides or, particularly in the case of older, private institutions, by legally binding royal or colonial charters. Both public and private governing boards are generally constituted of citizen trustees. In the public case those trustees are often political appointees who serve as a fundamental link between the institution and state and national political structures.In the United States the tradition of lay oversight of colleges and universities can be traced to the founding of Harvard College in 1636. Subsequent private colleges adopted this form of governance, which the U. S. Supreme Court deemed constitutional in its Dartmouth College decision of 1819. Public colleges and universities followed suit, although on the public side the role of oversees in trustee appointments and the key role of legislative funding in institutional development has meant that the states play a central role in the governance Of the institutions.The federal government has influenced the organization of higher education primarily through legislation-the Merrill Acts, the Higher Education Acts, and the G. L. Bill, for instance-that reinforced decentralized governance and, hence, the authority of institutional governing boards at both public and private institutions. As John Millet noted, It has long been evident that it is the state governments rather than the federal overspent that carry the primary authority and responsibility for higher education in the United States (p. 1).Governing board members at public institutions typically arrive at the trustee table by one of four paths: direct appointment by the governor; ex-officio appointment; gubernatorial ap pointment subject to approval of the state legislature; and less free intently, election by popular vote. Public university board members represent the citizens of the state and the terms and conditions of their service are often defined by institutional charter or state constitution. Private boards are nearly self-perpetuating, with new trustees chosen by the membership of the standing board.While private colleges and universities benefit considerably from public subsidies and support, private boards are not subject to the same degree of external scrutiny or intervention as are public boards. By Google Canadian University Earn an International Degree from UK University. Get Free Information Multifariousnesss. Com Highly Trusted Sponsor Get Recognized Degree in Business Apply NOW ABE, AM, BAA ABA, BBS.. Www. Strangleholds. Com study MusiC Attica Leading Undergraduate Courses Find out more! Sydney, Australia www. CACM. Du. AU Vienna MBA: US Accredited Global Perspective, Am.University top faculty, flexible evening prop www. Webster. AC. At equally g nonprogrammer,l Mpoor Knack, Ton a Ahoy WV. ALLS. Our The formal responsibilities of university governing boards are significant even as they are few in number. They include preservation of the university charter; institutional performance evaluations; fundraising; liaison with external agencies and political bodies; budget approval; oversight of campus policies and investment strategies; and, perhaps most important, hiring and evaluating the ongoing performance of the university president.Because of their visibility, symbolic importance, and control over policies with significant political salience, public university boards became subject to increasing challenges from a variety of interests in the last two decades of the twentieth century. These challenges were accompanied by demands for non-partisan board appointments and trustees that are more representative of the broader society, as well as calls for increased scrutiny of potential conflicts of interest.Boards were also challenged by governors and legislators concerned about issues ranging from rising costs to faculty ideology. A response to the eighteen pressures on governing boards was a push for improved trustee education programs in several states in the pursuit of more open and effective governance processes. Given its myriad responsibilities and powers, a strong argument can be made that the board is the most powerful governing agent of the modern university.The President The liaison between a postsecondary institution and its governing board is the highest ranking executive officer, a president or chancellor. The president provides overall leadership to the institution and presides over its academic and administrative bureaus. The president generally works closely with a robots, who is responsible for academic affairs, and a chief financial officer, who oversees the institutions fiduciary operations. The president serves as the lead fundraiser, and as a key representative of the university and its academic community to external agencies and actors. Residential duties include fostering a positive public image of the institution as a site of higher learning, maintaining a close relationship with the institutional governing board to further the presidents agenda, and forging points of common cause and agreement with the entire university community and its constituents. Since World War II the job of university president has become considerably more complex, and in many ways more constrained. Presidential authority has been eroded as boards and external actors have gained more legitimate roles in university governance.Presidential satisfaction has declined, and the average presidential tenure is shorter than before World War II. No responsibility consumes the modern-day presidents time and energy more than his or her role as the institutions principal fundraiser, a task made especial ly difficult because it requires extensive time away from the institution. While presidential fundraising has been a function of private universities for centuries, the emergence of significant public university fundraising in the 1 sass and sass is a major development. Fueled by decreasing state and federal support in recent years, public universities have been forced to take on a more significant share of their own funding with development playing a major role in this process. Faculty The formal governing body of the faculty at the institutional level is the academic senate, a body generally comprised of tenured and tenure-track faculty from the various disciplines and professional schools. The faculty senate and its attendant committees provide elected faculty liaisons to the university board and president.A primary function of the senate is to represent the voice of the faculty in matters of university governance. [pick Each school or college within a university is under the direction of a dean. A chairperson or department head supervises individual departments of instruction. Faculty members are ranked, in descending order, as professor, associate professor, assistant professor, and instructor. Faculty of various ranks may or may not be tenured, depending on the institution.Faculty members can be dismissed from their posts unless and until they have been granted tenure, a term denoting a measure of academic job security that is earned through a combination of demonstrated teaching, research, and service contributions. The faculty generally has significant influence over the hiring of new faculty members, tenure and promotion procedures, the university curriculum and graduation requirements, and admissions criteria. While the role of the faculty in governance was at one time largely advisory, over time the faculty has become increasingly engaged in policy formation.In any cases the faculty possesses significant authority over academic affairs. Faculty representatives are often found on governing boards, in formal or informal (non-voting) positions. The formal authority Of the faculty may be codified in institutional charters or in the standing rules of institutional governi ng boards. A number of other factors and informal agreements shape the degree to which faculty are involved in institutional affairs. Many colleges and universities ties have a commitment to a process of shared governance that incorporates the faculty in various aspects of institutional decision- asking.A collegial relationship between the faculty senate and the college or university president is a key component of shared governance, as is the relationship between the faculty senate and the institutional governing board. Faculty authority is also shaped by the strength and reputation of the institutions academic departments and departmental leadership, as well as the facultys symbolic importance as teachers and producers of knowledge, and the legitimacy provided by individual faculty members professional expertise. National organizations also contribute to the legitimacy and organizational standing of the American professor.Among these, the most prominent is the American Association of Univers ity Professors (AUP). Established in 191 5 to advance the collective interests, ideals, and standards of the fledgling university professor, the ALP has since that time become best known for its role in the defense of academic freedom and tenure. The Japes clearest articulation of this role can be found in its declaration, Statement of Principles on Academic Freedom and Tenure (1995). Over time the JAPE has developed initiatives on other aspects of faculty life, including shared university governance.In the last two decades of the twentieth century research on faculty turned attention to the rapid growth in the percentage of non-tenured and non-tenure track faculty in colleges and universities, a shift with significant implications for the organizational structure and governance of those institutions. Administration and Staff Internal university administration is composed of two interrelated administrative cohorts: one is responsible for the oversight and administration of academic affairs; the other is charged with institutional administration. The academic and institutional administrations are often in inflict with one another.The growth of the institutional administrative cohort after World War II has led to what some res earchers perceive as disproportionate influence on the part of the institutional administration. The increasing growth and autonomy of the institutional administrative cohort also challenges the traditional perception of the overall mission of the universitys administration as one of academic support and facilitation. As Amity Edition (1964) has noted, there is an essential tension in organizations such as colleges and universities that are driven by professional expertise but deed by administrators.This has produced demands for a cohort of administrative leaders who can bring professional education and credentials to institutional managerial practice. Within the academic administration, the president presides over a hierarchy that generally consists of a number of senior officers, including a university provost, and the deans of individual colleges and professional programs. Academic administrators are traditionally drawn from the faculty ranks, where departmental leadership positions serve as preparation for university-wide academic leadership roles.The managerial cohort of the institutional administration is led by a chief financial officer and various senior executives. The chief financial officer provides leadership and direction to a host of administrative functions that generally includes student services, institutional support, maintenance and operation of the physical plant, and auxiliary enterprises. These individual units in turn encompass smaller departments responsible for more specialized services. The latter part of the twentieth century witnessed increased demands for greater efficiency, productivity, and entrepreneurial management at colleges and universities.Efficiency initiatives in particular, including outsourcing of institutional functions and the hiring of adjunct faculty, engendered significant internal conflict between the managerial and academic administrations. Students Historically students have not had a significant role in the organizational structure or governance of colleges and universities. During most of the nineteenth century, college administrations followed a practice of in loco parents, an educational philosophy that led university administrators and faculty members to oversee the academic advancement and personal induct of their students very closely.Over time a gradual loosening of the institutional academic and social oversight occurred, a result of the universitys incorporation of the German university model that emphasized greater student and facu lty freedom. The heightened social and intellectual autonomy available to undergraduates encouraged students to seek greater involvement in university governance and administrative affairs. Student interest in university organization and governance increased significantly in the sass. In the aftermath of student unrest and demands for increased detent involvement in campus affairs, a degree of student participation on university boards, search committees, and faculty senates has become commonplace. Many colleges and universities include a student representative in either an advisory or voting position on the board of trustees. In addition, students often have their own network of parallel undergraduate and graduate governance organizations headed by a student body president and elected representatives that have contact with university officials, such as the president and the board.Future Prospects As the American university moves into the twenty-first century, a number of actors, including the increased complexity of institutional functions, changing student demographics, demands for entrepreneurial behavior, technological innovations, and increases in external interest group interventions will significantly challenge existing organizational structures and process es. The rapid growth in demand for continuing education and the provision of distance programs by colleges and universities in particular has challenged traditional notions of the content and delivery of postsecondary education.A number of key political shifts, including a growing retreat from public funding f colleges and universities, demands for prevarication of college and university services, and the use of the university as an instrument in broader national political struggles, will further complicate organizational arrangements. These political shifts entail considerably more institutional outreach to legislatures, governors, and key interest groups at the state and national levels, as well as additional staff in governmental and public relations. Finally, the rise of what Richard T. Ingram terms activist trusteeship and increasingly interventionist stances taken by public and riveter institutional governing boards may require increased collective action by internal cohorts. In order to preserve institutional autonomy and shared governance in a time of increasing political conflict, effort will also need to be directed to creating more effective organizational bridges between colleges and university leaders and institutional governing boards.